Law professor Amy Kapczynski on why progressives need to move from a defensive position to a positive vision for the highest court in the country

Andy Warhol’s latest 15 minutes of fame came during oral arguments in a case that may determine the future of “fair use” transformations.

Tough talk about applying antitrust law against the oil cartel means nothing unless we follow through, and the time to do that isn’t now.

The rave reviews that the newest Supreme Court justice received on her debut were well deserved, but they’ve created a set of outsize expectations that she can never fulfill.

Clarence Thomas sat silent for years before he said a word. The court’s newest justice came out swinging at her first hearing.

If the Mar-a-Lago affair has taught us anything, it’s that as long as Trump-appointed judges exist, all bets are off.

A recent spat between a judge and Yale Law School forces us to consider whether the federal judiciary should continue to be a spoils system for the well connected.

Percoco v. United States would seem to be a pretty clear-cut case of political bribery. That the justices are even willing to hear it is a bad sign.

The Supreme Court is going to get a crack at Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act—and the internet may never be the same.

The high court is set to hear two major cases that could allow the conservative majority to redefine the Equal Protection Clause.

A rather odd plaintiff—with some convoluted legal arguments—has emerged to sue the administration over its loan forgiveness proposal.

Right-wing judicial hegemony presents a daunting challenge for liberal leaders—but not an insurmountable one.

Americans’ antipathy toward the high court is deepening—and for the first time, a slim majority favors expansion.

As national issues increasingly dominate local politics, the downsides of our federalist system may be outweighing the virtues.

A trio of American Samoan plaintiffs are asking the high court to end their status as second-class citizens.

The Senate won’t be voting on a bill to protect same-sex marriage until after the election. But that doesn’t mean it won’t pass at all.

The right-wing court’s abortion decision could cost the Republicans the Senate—and thus deny McConnell another term as majority leader.

John Eastman has some wild-eyed ideas about “independent state legislature theory,” and he’s hoping the high court’s majority will be willing to play along next term.

Judge Aileen Cannon, of the now-infamous special master ruling, is the latest star of a conservative legal movement that gleefully engages in sloppy jurisprudence—with profound consequences for us all.

A Texas judge’s ruling that employers don’t have to cover HIV-prevention medication is further proof that the right sees public health policy merely as a tool to punish political enemies.