It isn’t a coincidence. The court is corrupt, both judicially and ethically, because of the extreme ideology six of its justices serve.

Justice Samuel Alito is inventing a new way for the high court to substitute its own judgment for that of lawmakers.

A case involving the EPA’s protection of wetlands somehow became a forum for some fiery justice-on-justice warfare over textualism.

An organization representing government workers is making a preemptive strike against the mounting default crisis.

And it’s entirely possible if he becomes president.

The justice’s vision of the judiciary’s role in public health may be more dangerous than any Covid-era restriction.

The high court’s ruling on the nature of “transformative” works of art could have major ramifications for artists working today—as well as the A.I. enthusiasts looking toward tomorrow.

A recent lower court ruling has neatly exposed the Supreme Court’s conservative majority’s funny ideas about the Bill of Rights.

A recent Supreme Court ruling on gun rights is leading to interesting results in the lower courts.

Two of the more aggressive Senate Democrats are asking Thomas and Harlan Crow questions. And they have a lot of ways to get answers.

Intentionally or not, the justice revealed a certain amount of awareness of how the high court’s conservative majority—and its power—is perceived.

The charges leveled against the New York lawmaker highlight how little thought he put into his grift.

Conservatives are up in arms that the high court has become embroiled in a legitimacy crisis.

The justice has consistently ruled in ways that favor political favor-traders.

He has the evidence on his side, but the high court usually can’t be dissuaded from upholding a death penalty conviction.

Join us in an urgent project to track the dangerous ideas and decisions of this activist court.

The justices have agreed to hear a case that could make it easier to kneecap federal agencies.