Republicans haven’t lost too often at the high court of late—but when they do, they’re sore losers indeed.

Instead of greeting the most recent set of decisions from the Roberts Court with downcast disses, critics should recognize—and celebrate—the way they influenced the results.

The former president is demanding a change in trial venue, for the same reason he demanded that votes not get counted in certain U.S. cities.

At least one Supreme Court justice thinks something needs to change.

The Federalist Society’s leader is hoping to pluck a “get out of jail free” card from Donald Trump’s back pocket.

The chief justice doesn’t like his conservative Supreme Court colleagues getting called out for judicial overreach.

It’s a long fight—but it has already begun, with promising results.

The affirmative action ruling doesn’t end the diversity debate so much as push it into new areas.

The rulings seriously curtail race-conscious college admissions, effectively ending a decades-old policy.

The ruling in Moore v. Harper kills the independent state legislature theory, scoring a victory for American democracy.

Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh joined with the court’s liberals, but would they do it again?

It isn’t a coincidence. The court is corrupt, both judicially and ethically, because of the extreme ideology six of its justices serve.

The chief justice says you don’t need to be worried about the Supreme Court’s ethics. They’ll handle it themselves.

Join us in an urgent project to track the dangerous ideas and decisions of this activist court.

Another financial scandal for another Supreme Court justice.

Don’t let their friends distract you: The Supreme Court justice and his megadonor pal have had a malign influence on the judicial system.

On abortion medication, the justices would have very good reasons to leave the status quo intact for FDA drug approvals.

If the former president needs a legal bailout, his pal from South Carolina knows where he might be able to get one.

Why a relatively young legal doctrine has become all the rage among the court’s right-wing majority

There are enough justices who seem to oppose the president’s proposal on the merits. That doesn’t mean there are enough votes to strike it down—yet.