The justices have agreed to hear a case that could make it easier to kneecap federal agencies.

Another financial scandal for another Supreme Court justice.

This lawsuit has it all: tangled politics, obscure legal doctrines, and the possibility of the Supreme Court again upending American life.

It’s not just an abortion pill. It’s also critical for pregnant women facing a tragic loss.

While the Supreme Court temporarily preserved access to the abortion pill, these constant switches make it harder for those seeking abortion, as well as their providers.

Clarence Thomas’s news-making scandals have senators eager to rein in the high court. At least one Republican has signed on to the effort.

The calls for the Supreme Court justice to step down are growing.

The drop in confidence comes as the Supreme Court debates the future of the abortion pill.

The laws proposed around the country by Republicans would make life for transgender people functionally impossible. The danger is in being under-wrought, not overwrought.

Access to mifepristone will remain available while the legal battle plays out.

The party needs to take its cue from America’s most celebrated leaders, who had no fear of talking directly to the public about the Constitution.

The justices could decide to revive a Victorian-era vice law that bans the mailing of abortion materials entirely.

Mazie Hirono says there will be a hearing on the Supreme Court not following a code of ethics. Mmmm, OK. But what else, Democrats?

The “nonpartisan” group also relied on Crow—whom it dubbed one of its “whales”—to reel in nearly two dozen other donors from 2019 to 2021.

Jeffrey Bossert Clark may be gone, but his influence on the agency’s environmental work is far from forgotten.

Conservatives are opening a new front in the war on education by pouring money into publicly funded yet religious or right-wing schools.

The legal fight on the FDA’s approval of mifepristone continues.

Don’t let their friends distract you: The Supreme Court justice and his megadonor pal have had a malign influence on the judicial system.

What are you prepared to do, Democrats?

The Supreme Court justice did not disclose the sales, according to a new report.