The Federalist Society’s leader is hoping to pluck a “get out of jail free” card from Donald Trump’s back pocket.

Critics of the liberal justices’ ethical lapses aren’t trying to make the case for reform—they’re trying to kill it.

An archive shows that the plaintiff in the Supreme Court case did once design a wedding website, contrary to what her lawyers presented during her legal challenge.

The former president’s pending third arrest will buoy the hearts of his opponents, only to cruelly break them—again.

The ahistorical dishonesty of the Supreme Court justice’s concurrence in the Harvard and UNC cases exposes the originalism fraud.

The justices will have a chance to further disrupt the balance of power between the courts, Congress, and the White House.

It’s the latest sign that the high court is the epicenter of U.S. politics.

The conservative justice has a lot to add on the biggest cases.

His ruling seems more interested in ideological grievance than the First Amendment.

The court once held that the Civil Rights Act trumped religious freedom. After these recent decisions, that’s over. The consequences could be enormous.

The chief justice doesn’t like his conservative Supreme Court colleagues getting called out for judicial overreach.

It’s a long fight—but it has already begun, with promising results.

The affirmative action ruling doesn’t end the diversity debate so much as push it into new areas.

He checked his privilege—and there’s definitely nothing to see there.

The ruling in Moore v. Harper kills the independent state legislature theory, scoring a victory for American democracy.

Given the recent ethics questions about justices’ interactions with billionaires, it’s an interesting case to take on.

The conservative justice is on course for an originalist fight with Neil Gorsuch.

It does illustrate the judicial ethics system’s blind spots, however.

Their Hunter Biden probe is about muddying the president, not finding actual corruption.

The head of the Brennan Center for Law and Justice has a new book—and a lot of thoughts on these upcoming, controversial court decisions.