A lot of nonprofits asked you for donations on Giving Tuesday. But simply moving your money might be more effective.

It’s not inevitable that we’ll stall or go backward on climate progress in the next four years. States can do far more to accelerate the energy transition than most people appreciate.

Tired of doomscrolling? Tempted to tune out? Here’s a more fruitful way to respond to the gloomy news of late.

The climate crisis offers one of the strongest fields imaginable for proving fealty to the working class against rapacious elites.

The state’s venerable New Deal history offers a way through our current malaise.

Responding to every stupid thing Trump does won’t help win the coming battles. Climate advocates in particular need deeper forms of reflection and engagement.

For climate activists, the current moment is almost unbearably bleak. But the task is clear: to build a mass movement that completely overhauls our current political system.

Republicans might not actually repeal the Inflation Reduction Act’s green energy incentives. But Trump can do plenty of damage to international climate progress without that.

Kamala Harris chose to stay silent on climate change. Activists mostly let her. And now the White House and likely both houses of Congress will be controlled by climate deniers.

The administration bet that subsidies to rebuild American manufacturing would bring voters back to the Democratic Party while lowering emissions. That bet has failed.

New data suggests environmentally motivated voters might matter more than previously thought. But their priorities haven’t gotten much airtime this election season.

Everyone's got a suggestion for how to de-stress. Alternatively, you could stress. This is stressful!

The options for president are a climate denier and a Democrat who doesn’t like talking about climate change very much. State policy could still help avert disaster.

Kamala Harris should speak plainly about climate change—and then talk about the many things she could do as president to fix the home insurance crisis.

These devastating storms are already political. And those affected by them deserve to hear a plan for the future.

One thing that needs to be said about this week's debate: Answers that bad, about devastation that severe, should be a scandal.

A for-profit insurance industry is a bad first line of defense against natural disasters. There’s a better way.

Already we can draw two big lessons from Hurricane Helene’s catastrophic fallout.

Emissions from Apple, Meta, and Google are growing. Somehow, they’re still treated as plausible sponsors for climate events.

What is it with Republicans and dog killing?